|
|
|
Evénement
Big Picture Projets en accès direct
| Jakob Nielsen
Jakob Nielsen est un spécialiste renommé de l'utilisabilité des sites Web. Ses textes nous rappellent au bon sens et aux qualités fondamentales du Web (lisibilité du contenu, mise en page claire et allant à l'essentiel, navigabilité, utilisation efficace des liens hypertexte). Il est conseillé d'aller lire son site Web.
Par exemple, voici ce que dit Jakob Nielsen sur le « Web 2.0 » : « A final reason why attention flows to things that matter little to mainstream business websites: the Web's chattering classes tend to be overly engaged in the "Internet elite experience." They actually care about the 'Net for its own sake, and go gaga over new ways of showing maps. In contrast, average users just want to complete tasks online. They don't particularly like the Web, and they'd like to get back to their jobs or families as quickly as possible. Wall Street experiencing Web Bubble 2.0 is one thing. But I'm concerned that Internet professionals are getting a dangerous sniff of bubble vapors as well, deluding themselves into thinking that their preferences and interests represent those of normal customers. One of usability's most hard-earned lessons is that "you are not the user." If you work on a development project, you're atypical by definition. Design to optimize the user experience for outsiders, not insiders. The antidote to bubble vapor is user testing: find out what representative users need. It's tempting to work on what's hot, but to make money, focus on the basics that customers value. » Egalement ici sur l'usage des wikis :
"However, these practical Wikis are much more important than the overhyped ones (note : Wikipedia) : An intranet Wiki is an example of the trend toward simplified collaboration and non-bureaucratic workgroup support that will change the way we all work in the future.
The Wikipedia's most exciting aspect is that it's a highly interlinked hypertext. [...] Sadly, the Web has generally lost its foundation as hypertext, and most sites offer only heavily regimented navigation that's tied into an official information architecture. Usually, there's little in the way of associative, "see also" links and local navigation. Wikipedia shows the benefits of reverting to the view of websites as hypertexts.
We don't need bad copies [note : des logiciels Microsoft] -- we need collaborative authoring of hyperspaces as opposed to linear documents."
Faut-il traduire : sur un wiki définir les "termes" du débat pour les re-lier ?
Il n'y a pas de commentaire sur cette page.
[Afficher commentaires/formulaire]
|
